After one year, I’m exhausted yet satisfied that I’ve given my best effort before handing over my fiction manuscript to a professional editor. I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve read my work but the number of major revisions now stands at ten.
Looking back, each revision had a very specific focus. I spent hundreds of hours reading books between revisions -- classics, contemporary fiction and non-fiction books about writing -- each time collecting a new perspective that helped me to identify areas for improvement. I found reading to be a comfort at the end of a marathon editing session -- sometimes going back through the manuscript multiple times. At the end of each session, I struggled with the urge to continue my work despite my mental exhaustion. Reading books helped me to focus my mind on something other than my story, allowing time to recharge while considering the wisdom and advice of those who have far greater experience.
Now, I believe I’ve done all that I can do without outside help. I’ll try to rest while my mind paces like an expectant father, knowing the result will only require more work. By that time, I hope to have a fresh perspective and a willingness to accept the broader suggestions of a seasoned professional.
Friday, March 25, 2011
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Another step closer, yet still so far away
Alternating between reading and editing, I have now completed Revision Eight of my fiction manuscript, Box of Dreams. It is not really a unique part of my process to continuously rewrite sections. Ernest Hemingway rewrote sections of his stories many times before allowing anyone to read them. I know first hand the embarrassment of presenting a piece before it is time. A writer should accept the editing stage as an opportunity to work through every angle, sometimes reading stories hundreds of times before declaring it suitable for public scrutiny.
As a former project manager, I see parallels to the planning and execution stages. Creating architectural drawings is perfectly analogous to the process of creating an outline for a story. This is the stage in which principles are applied to ensure the pieces will go together to produce something aesthetically pleasing, yet functional. To me, writing the first draft is like erecting the steel framework for a building, it defines the outer parameters but the work is far from over. Bar joists and decking are laid between the structural members and concrete floors are poured before ducting and metal stud walls are installed. The list of details continues until the project is complete.
Similarly, creating a story begins with nothing more than a few ideas. As the ideas are further developed, changes are necessary to maintain consistency. The basics of writing help to establish a story that is hopefully plausible and intriguing. Yet, the writer continues to define each part of a story in sufficient detail to satisfy the reader. It continues until the story jumps from the page into the mind of the reader without drawing attention to the fundamental parts. It is like looking at a beautiful building without regard for the steel that is hidden beneath. We can hopefully appreciate it as a whole when it is done.
I have reached a point of saturation in which I can no longer see potential issues. This is not new. I have experienced it seven times previously. Each edit requires time to relax, separating myself from the work so that I may look at it with a fresh perspective, perhaps weeks from now. However, this time, I will seek the advice of an editor to help me understand how the story is perceived. It is also an opportunity to improve on style.
Luckily, I have short stories that must be edited before the submission deadline of April 15th. It will keep me busy for a few weeks and then I will go back and make any necessary changes to my manuscript before approaching agents and publishers with the best that I have to offer and hopefully move to the next phase, marketing, with a whole new list of issues with which to contend.
As a former project manager, I see parallels to the planning and execution stages. Creating architectural drawings is perfectly analogous to the process of creating an outline for a story. This is the stage in which principles are applied to ensure the pieces will go together to produce something aesthetically pleasing, yet functional. To me, writing the first draft is like erecting the steel framework for a building, it defines the outer parameters but the work is far from over. Bar joists and decking are laid between the structural members and concrete floors are poured before ducting and metal stud walls are installed. The list of details continues until the project is complete.
Similarly, creating a story begins with nothing more than a few ideas. As the ideas are further developed, changes are necessary to maintain consistency. The basics of writing help to establish a story that is hopefully plausible and intriguing. Yet, the writer continues to define each part of a story in sufficient detail to satisfy the reader. It continues until the story jumps from the page into the mind of the reader without drawing attention to the fundamental parts. It is like looking at a beautiful building without regard for the steel that is hidden beneath. We can hopefully appreciate it as a whole when it is done.
I have reached a point of saturation in which I can no longer see potential issues. This is not new. I have experienced it seven times previously. Each edit requires time to relax, separating myself from the work so that I may look at it with a fresh perspective, perhaps weeks from now. However, this time, I will seek the advice of an editor to help me understand how the story is perceived. It is also an opportunity to improve on style.
Luckily, I have short stories that must be edited before the submission deadline of April 15th. It will keep me busy for a few weeks and then I will go back and make any necessary changes to my manuscript before approaching agents and publishers with the best that I have to offer and hopefully move to the next phase, marketing, with a whole new list of issues with which to contend.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
On submissions and revisions
I have officially submitted the additional chapters for the non-fiction book proposal. Waiting is not something that I do particularly well, so I look for other projects to keep my mind busy. Luckily, I am ready to work on Revision 7 of my fiction manuscript.
Writers vary widely in their approach to writing a novel. Some spend years outlining a story while others allow the story to unfold as they are writing. My process is really a little of both. That is, I allow myself a great amount of freedom during the conceptual stages, letting the story develop along with the characters. Then, I create a general outline that helps me to establish a consistent story arc. But, I also allow myself sufficient freedom during the writing process.
The result is a draft story that has a beginning, a middle and an ending, allowing me to see the potential impact of the story and where it needs work. During this initial process, I find it necessary to write some descriptions where I would much rather have dialog or action. It is a reminder to rewrite sections that show rather than tell. In the short term, I am able to continue the flow of the story without interruption, knowing that I must revise the draft.
Each revision is an attempt to insert needed elements, but it is a slow process. The balance between getting the story out versus outlining every detail is a personal preference. I am comfortable with my approach, but it is tailored to my personality. Likewise, other writers must find what works best for them.
When does this process end? It ends when I have done all that I can do to move a story forward. From that point, it either goes to a professional editor or it is submitted to agents depending on my confidence level. The threshold for acceptance is very high in today's market, so a submission should catch and hold the attention of a publisher.
Writers vary widely in their approach to writing a novel. Some spend years outlining a story while others allow the story to unfold as they are writing. My process is really a little of both. That is, I allow myself a great amount of freedom during the conceptual stages, letting the story develop along with the characters. Then, I create a general outline that helps me to establish a consistent story arc. But, I also allow myself sufficient freedom during the writing process.
The result is a draft story that has a beginning, a middle and an ending, allowing me to see the potential impact of the story and where it needs work. During this initial process, I find it necessary to write some descriptions where I would much rather have dialog or action. It is a reminder to rewrite sections that show rather than tell. In the short term, I am able to continue the flow of the story without interruption, knowing that I must revise the draft.
Each revision is an attempt to insert needed elements, but it is a slow process. The balance between getting the story out versus outlining every detail is a personal preference. I am comfortable with my approach, but it is tailored to my personality. Likewise, other writers must find what works best for them.
When does this process end? It ends when I have done all that I can do to move a story forward. From that point, it either goes to a professional editor or it is submitted to agents depending on my confidence level. The threshold for acceptance is very high in today's market, so a submission should catch and hold the attention of a publisher.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Hats off to the prose
I have a whole new appreciation for professional writers. Journalists do not have the luxury of sitting on a piece for months until the mood strikes. They produce quality work with regularity.
I intentionally placed pressure on myself to write new chapters for "Writing Between the Nodes", my non-fiction book proposal. I wanted the experience of creating and editing a volume of work within set boundaries. Although it is far from the daily grind of a newspaper columnist or reporter, writing on a deadline is far different than writing at one's leisure.
In the first week, I wrote a draft Introduction along with six draft chapters. In the following two weeks, I drafted two additional chapters and edited five previously drafted chapters. The last few days have been devoted to the Introduction, which oddly, caused the most trouble for me as referenced in my previous post.
So what did I learn? First of all, writing is hard work. There is a mental fatigue that lingers well after completing an ambitious assignment. But, there is a sense of satisfaction and a very strange urge to "get up and do it again", following Jackson Browne's tag line with a slight twist.
For me, it was a different sensation than completing a fiction manuscript, or a major edit of a manuscript. There is a certain finality with a manuscript, not knowing if you will return for another edit. And again for me, there is a short period of depression following a large project. I had a similar experience as a project manager. It's hard to explain, but it is like part of you is missing.
This project is somehow different. Perhaps it is knowing it may not be over. That will, of course, depend on my ability to convince a publisher that I have a marketable idea. There is no post project melancholy. But, although I feel satisfied at having completed an interim task, there is also no great feeling of accomplishment. It is held in limbo, waiting for some indication that my work was on target. Perhaps then I might break out the Welch's grape juice. Champagne would be nice, but the stepwise progression of a book proposal does not rise to the level of Moet Chandon. That level of celebration is reserved for a larger goal.
I can honestly say there were moments when I'd lost my way. I succumbed briefly to self doubt, wondering if it would result in catastrophe. I questioned the writer's "voice" I had used to prepare the initial chapters and fell headlong into a rendition of Ben Stein there for a while. I can thank my writer's group for helping me to "snap out of it". I always envision Cher slapping a young Nicolas Cage for some reason when I think of that line.
Then, I could no longer read my work objectively. I must admit, that was a little scary. It seemed like I was writing just to put words on a page. Was it the early onset of Alzheimer's? I don't think so. I think it was writer's fatigue. What was I talking about? Hmmmmm.....it'll come back to me. I hope.
I intentionally placed pressure on myself to write new chapters for "Writing Between the Nodes", my non-fiction book proposal. I wanted the experience of creating and editing a volume of work within set boundaries. Although it is far from the daily grind of a newspaper columnist or reporter, writing on a deadline is far different than writing at one's leisure.
In the first week, I wrote a draft Introduction along with six draft chapters. In the following two weeks, I drafted two additional chapters and edited five previously drafted chapters. The last few days have been devoted to the Introduction, which oddly, caused the most trouble for me as referenced in my previous post.
So what did I learn? First of all, writing is hard work. There is a mental fatigue that lingers well after completing an ambitious assignment. But, there is a sense of satisfaction and a very strange urge to "get up and do it again", following Jackson Browne's tag line with a slight twist.
For me, it was a different sensation than completing a fiction manuscript, or a major edit of a manuscript. There is a certain finality with a manuscript, not knowing if you will return for another edit. And again for me, there is a short period of depression following a large project. I had a similar experience as a project manager. It's hard to explain, but it is like part of you is missing.
This project is somehow different. Perhaps it is knowing it may not be over. That will, of course, depend on my ability to convince a publisher that I have a marketable idea. There is no post project melancholy. But, although I feel satisfied at having completed an interim task, there is also no great feeling of accomplishment. It is held in limbo, waiting for some indication that my work was on target. Perhaps then I might break out the Welch's grape juice. Champagne would be nice, but the stepwise progression of a book proposal does not rise to the level of Moet Chandon. That level of celebration is reserved for a larger goal.
I can honestly say there were moments when I'd lost my way. I succumbed briefly to self doubt, wondering if it would result in catastrophe. I questioned the writer's "voice" I had used to prepare the initial chapters and fell headlong into a rendition of Ben Stein there for a while. I can thank my writer's group for helping me to "snap out of it". I always envision Cher slapping a young Nicolas Cage for some reason when I think of that line.
Then, I could no longer read my work objectively. I must admit, that was a little scary. It seemed like I was writing just to put words on a page. Was it the early onset of Alzheimer's? I don't think so. I think it was writer's fatigue. What was I talking about? Hmmmmm.....it'll come back to me. I hope.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
A Peculiar Blindness
I thought things were going very well, at least, until now.
I attended my writer's group last night with a newly written introduction for my proposed book. I thought the introduction would help the reader understand both my purpose and my thought process. Easy stuff, right? Wrong! I simply failed to see the glaring issues until it was too late.
The comments from my group were justifiably critical regarding style, voice and redundancy. While it may come as a surprise to some, writer's must seek unbiased feedback for their work, or risk falling under some hypnotic trance.
Oddly, I realized some of the issues at the last minute. I usually look over my work one last time while the group reads. Holy Cow! I began to see the redundancies. I could actually "hear" the deadpan voice of that teacher on The Wonder Years, except he was blathering on about writing and engineering. No, that was MY voice! I was the one delivering lifeless drivel, not content to say it once, but to repeat it over and over.
I had read the piece several times. I had a marathon day yesterday editing four chapters that I had hoped to submit this week. I even edited the introduction. What happened?
I simply could not see my errors while in the comfort of my office.
What I need is an excuse. Let's see.....hmmmmm. That's it! The sun was in my eyes! Nah, they'll never buy that. Perhaps they'll believe I have devoted too much time writing and editing and that I am suffering from some form of editor's blindness. That sounds much better, I'm going with that one.
All kidding aside, I really could not see the mistakes but I think there may be a clue to what is actually happening. If I am able to see the errors in the class, then why couldn't I see them beforehand? I think I have a form of writer's laziness. But wait a minute! I have written fifteen thousand words, read the material multiple times and I have already made corrections. Laziness?!!!! That's absurd!
Not so fast. It is a FORM of laziness. It is laziness of the brain and the eyes.
Luckily, I am not the only one to experience this malady. It is actually quite common, but it seems very new to me. This is why writers are encouraged to present their written materials for objective criticism. As for my pride, I think it will recover. We can all use a good dose of humility from time to time. Hopefully, I will learn from this experience. Maybe I should drink a Red Bull before editing. Maybe I should hire a professional editor.
I attended my writer's group last night with a newly written introduction for my proposed book. I thought the introduction would help the reader understand both my purpose and my thought process. Easy stuff, right? Wrong! I simply failed to see the glaring issues until it was too late.
The comments from my group were justifiably critical regarding style, voice and redundancy. While it may come as a surprise to some, writer's must seek unbiased feedback for their work, or risk falling under some hypnotic trance.
Oddly, I realized some of the issues at the last minute. I usually look over my work one last time while the group reads. Holy Cow! I began to see the redundancies. I could actually "hear" the deadpan voice of that teacher on The Wonder Years, except he was blathering on about writing and engineering. No, that was MY voice! I was the one delivering lifeless drivel, not content to say it once, but to repeat it over and over.
I had read the piece several times. I had a marathon day yesterday editing four chapters that I had hoped to submit this week. I even edited the introduction. What happened?
I simply could not see my errors while in the comfort of my office.
What I need is an excuse. Let's see.....hmmmmm. That's it! The sun was in my eyes! Nah, they'll never buy that. Perhaps they'll believe I have devoted too much time writing and editing and that I am suffering from some form of editor's blindness. That sounds much better, I'm going with that one.
All kidding aside, I really could not see the mistakes but I think there may be a clue to what is actually happening. If I am able to see the errors in the class, then why couldn't I see them beforehand? I think I have a form of writer's laziness. But wait a minute! I have written fifteen thousand words, read the material multiple times and I have already made corrections. Laziness?!!!! That's absurd!
Not so fast. It is a FORM of laziness. It is laziness of the brain and the eyes.
Luckily, I am not the only one to experience this malady. It is actually quite common, but it seems very new to me. This is why writers are encouraged to present their written materials for objective criticism. As for my pride, I think it will recover. We can all use a good dose of humility from time to time. Hopefully, I will learn from this experience. Maybe I should drink a Red Bull before editing. Maybe I should hire a professional editor.
Monday, February 7, 2011
Writing builds character
Writing is an unconventional way to learn about any topic, but it can be motivational because a writer must research areas of particular weakness to avoid embarrassment. This is not a new concept. Anyone who has written a term paper should confirm that it works, following any respectable level of diligence.
I recently wrote everything I knew about character development, but found it necessary to verify facts. This learning process is extraordinarily effective as it not only tests my ability to write on the topic but also uncovers some potential misconceptions. It is a process of learning by doing (having the gall to write a book in the first place) and then another process of retracing the steps to evaluate what works and what does not work.
Perhaps more benefit is in the need to expand a topic beyond my own sphere of understanding and/or experience. For example, I must research the topic of character development to present a comprehensive view. It provides an opportunity to fully explore what I know and what I do not know.
My adventure into character development began a few weeks ago when I drafted a new chapter for my book proposal. I went back several times to edit my work, adding necessary transitions but also checking my facts. I am more confident now that most of what I wrote was in good company among far greater practitioners than myself. But, I must also supplement what I know with areas that I do not know to provide a more balanced viewpoint. Again, this is extraordinarily valuable as I discover areas of weakness and then feverishly work to make up for my deficiencies. Now I know the material well enough to pass the test.
I recently wrote everything I knew about character development, but found it necessary to verify facts. This learning process is extraordinarily effective as it not only tests my ability to write on the topic but also uncovers some potential misconceptions. It is a process of learning by doing (having the gall to write a book in the first place) and then another process of retracing the steps to evaluate what works and what does not work.
Perhaps more benefit is in the need to expand a topic beyond my own sphere of understanding and/or experience. For example, I must research the topic of character development to present a comprehensive view. It provides an opportunity to fully explore what I know and what I do not know.
My adventure into character development began a few weeks ago when I drafted a new chapter for my book proposal. I went back several times to edit my work, adding necessary transitions but also checking my facts. I am more confident now that most of what I wrote was in good company among far greater practitioners than myself. But, I must also supplement what I know with areas that I do not know to provide a more balanced viewpoint. Again, this is extraordinarily valuable as I discover areas of weakness and then feverishly work to make up for my deficiencies. Now I know the material well enough to pass the test.
Friday, February 4, 2011
Consultation with Book Doctor, David Sterry
I enjoyed my conversation with David Sterry yesterday. He was very accommodating and provided some extraordinarily insightful comments regarding my pitch AND possibilities for my fiction manuscript.
I agreed to send a copy of my manuscript to him after completing Revision Six. I believe my story is still a little flat in places and in need of yet another edit. Writing is hard work, in case anyone has any doubts.
David is an actor with an amazing list of credits. He is also an author of 12 books whose most recent book made the cover of the Sunday New York Times Book Review. His wife, Arielle Eckstut, is an agent at large with the Levine Greenberg Agency, author of 7 books and successful co-founder of Little Miss Matched.
I have read their book, The Essential Guide to Getting Your Book Published. It is a comprehensive manual for aspiring authors with answers to many questions.
I agreed to send a copy of my manuscript to him after completing Revision Six. I believe my story is still a little flat in places and in need of yet another edit. Writing is hard work, in case anyone has any doubts.
David is an actor with an amazing list of credits. He is also an author of 12 books whose most recent book made the cover of the Sunday New York Times Book Review. His wife, Arielle Eckstut, is an agent at large with the Levine Greenberg Agency, author of 7 books and successful co-founder of Little Miss Matched.
I have read their book, The Essential Guide to Getting Your Book Published. It is a comprehensive manual for aspiring authors with answers to many questions.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Attempting to write amid snow, noise and vampires
Today, I have a consultation call with David Sterry and Arielle Eckstut, The Book Doctors. I will pitch my fiction manuscript, Box of Dreams, to them. As I mentioned in a previous posting, I attended their "Pitchapalooza" event last month. It was a great opportunity to hear other writers pitch their manuscripts to an expert panel.
In the meantime, the non-fiction project has been slightly delayed by the blizzard. Four hours shoveling snow and a house full of wives, kids, puppies, cats and fish are not ideal conditions for writing. Just kidding. I only had one wife, one kid, one puppy and one cat at home yesterday, though it seemed like I had more at times.
I was able to finally finish reading "Dracula" by Bram Stoker. I can strike that one off my list of classics to read before I croak. I think I've now read about half of a list of 100 greatest novels of all time, depending on the list.
I realize perhaps for the first time that even classic novels are not perfect. It's a bit subjective, but it's possible to find flaws. However, classic novels are highly regarded for a variety of attributes that one may possess over the other. The reader can accept the strengths without regard for the weaknesses.
Lawrence Block talks about "suspension of disbelief" in his book entitled "Telling Lies for Fun and Profit". This is the ability of a writer to develop characters, plot and setting that are plausible for the reader. Stated differently, the reader may relate to these elements very easily. Fiction is inherently flawed by the establishment of characters, events and setting that are often far beyond the boundaries of reality. They are creations that the reader will either accept or reject. Therefore, the art of writing fiction is the ability to suspend disbelief so perfection in fiction, like reality, is not possible. The ability to convince the reader becomes a measure of the writer's ability to create plausible characters.
Bram Stoker does this with Dracula. But, I was surprised at some of the underlying themes. Somehow, in my mind, the vampire stereotype was applied to Stoker's Dracula. I never saw him as a creature to be pitied, yet Stoker does present him as a victim. It is also a love story with erotic undertones. I was most surprised at the underlying Christian theme in the story. It is a classic story of good versus evil that passes through a variety of contemporary genres.
Having participated in a writer's group for over a year, I can appreciate the value of reading a story with a critical eye. Nonetheless, I will not allow my attention to detail alter my perspective as a casual reader. That is, I will continue to enjoy a story despite the inevitable flaws that exist in any work of fiction. I enjoyed "Dracula" very much, but I can set aside the critical analysis of the work with the understanding that all fiction has strengths and weaknesses.
So, what was wrong with it? Actually, nothing is WRONG with it. It is a compelling story in which I was able to suspend disbelief. That is, I was able to visualize and relate to characters that are....at least for most of us....nonexistent. BUT, I would say that the story is relatively flat at points. The reason? In some parts, the story offers vivid images with stunning character developments while other parts are repetitive with very little action. In other words, I began to expect the same level of intensity throughout the story. The story was slightly unbalanced in this regard. The end of the story again becomes highly compressed with action and intensity, but the final events end a little too quickly for me. It seemed that Stoker was a little rushed at the end of his story.
These are minor weaknesses for a story written in the 1800's. Sadly, today's writer must maintain a level of interest among readers who are overstimulated and attention deficit. Today's reader expects consistency and highly compressed information from a novel. Nonetheless, "Dracula" belongs in the Top 100 Novels of All Times for its originality and images that continue to inspire a variety of similar stories with similar characters.
In the meantime, the non-fiction project has been slightly delayed by the blizzard. Four hours shoveling snow and a house full of wives, kids, puppies, cats and fish are not ideal conditions for writing. Just kidding. I only had one wife, one kid, one puppy and one cat at home yesterday, though it seemed like I had more at times.
I was able to finally finish reading "Dracula" by Bram Stoker. I can strike that one off my list of classics to read before I croak. I think I've now read about half of a list of 100 greatest novels of all time, depending on the list.
I realize perhaps for the first time that even classic novels are not perfect. It's a bit subjective, but it's possible to find flaws. However, classic novels are highly regarded for a variety of attributes that one may possess over the other. The reader can accept the strengths without regard for the weaknesses.
Lawrence Block talks about "suspension of disbelief" in his book entitled "Telling Lies for Fun and Profit". This is the ability of a writer to develop characters, plot and setting that are plausible for the reader. Stated differently, the reader may relate to these elements very easily. Fiction is inherently flawed by the establishment of characters, events and setting that are often far beyond the boundaries of reality. They are creations that the reader will either accept or reject. Therefore, the art of writing fiction is the ability to suspend disbelief so perfection in fiction, like reality, is not possible. The ability to convince the reader becomes a measure of the writer's ability to create plausible characters.
Bram Stoker does this with Dracula. But, I was surprised at some of the underlying themes. Somehow, in my mind, the vampire stereotype was applied to Stoker's Dracula. I never saw him as a creature to be pitied, yet Stoker does present him as a victim. It is also a love story with erotic undertones. I was most surprised at the underlying Christian theme in the story. It is a classic story of good versus evil that passes through a variety of contemporary genres.
Having participated in a writer's group for over a year, I can appreciate the value of reading a story with a critical eye. Nonetheless, I will not allow my attention to detail alter my perspective as a casual reader. That is, I will continue to enjoy a story despite the inevitable flaws that exist in any work of fiction. I enjoyed "Dracula" very much, but I can set aside the critical analysis of the work with the understanding that all fiction has strengths and weaknesses.
So, what was wrong with it? Actually, nothing is WRONG with it. It is a compelling story in which I was able to suspend disbelief. That is, I was able to visualize and relate to characters that are....at least for most of us....nonexistent. BUT, I would say that the story is relatively flat at points. The reason? In some parts, the story offers vivid images with stunning character developments while other parts are repetitive with very little action. In other words, I began to expect the same level of intensity throughout the story. The story was slightly unbalanced in this regard. The end of the story again becomes highly compressed with action and intensity, but the final events end a little too quickly for me. It seemed that Stoker was a little rushed at the end of his story.
These are minor weaknesses for a story written in the 1800's. Sadly, today's writer must maintain a level of interest among readers who are overstimulated and attention deficit. Today's reader expects consistency and highly compressed information from a novel. Nonetheless, "Dracula" belongs in the Top 100 Novels of All Times for its originality and images that continue to inspire a variety of similar stories with similar characters.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
The new writer
New relationships are forming between artists and their fans. It is growing out of an increasing need for artists to market themselves, whether signed or unsigned. From my limited perspective, it seems that the curtain has been lifted to reveal an industry that once thrived on mystique. Today's artist is much more likely to expose various parts of their lives in return for fan loyalty.
With expanded communications, artists now have the potential to access many people. Videos, blogs, and podcasts have become an accepted part of world culture. It is exciting, but it is also a bit intimidating because the playing field is much larger. Unless you reside on the popular end of Chris Anderson's distribution curve, you must devote a significant amount of time developing various forms of marketing collateral to promote brand "you". This is the new competitive landscape for the arts. Without marketing infrastructure, the new artist must create a buzz for themselves which takes valuable time away from writing or performing. Today's artist is working around the clock trying to penetrate a diluted market.
For writers, this also applies to the manner in which we approach agents and the publishing business. A writer must write compelling material, but must also rise above the masses just to speak with an agent. Developing marketing collateral is vitally important to gain the attention of a prospective agent or publisher in this highly competitive environment. It is an indicator of both personal commitment and potential success.
So, what does this mean? I believe it signals changes in attitude for everyone on the lower end of the distribution curve. Writers cannot afford to approach the market with a superstar attitude. Today's writer is more likely to mow their own lawn and buy Girl Scout Cookies, rather than live in a 10,000 sq ft. home in Beverly Hills surrounded by a security fence.
With expanded communications, artists now have the potential to access many people. Videos, blogs, and podcasts have become an accepted part of world culture. It is exciting, but it is also a bit intimidating because the playing field is much larger. Unless you reside on the popular end of Chris Anderson's distribution curve, you must devote a significant amount of time developing various forms of marketing collateral to promote brand "you". This is the new competitive landscape for the arts. Without marketing infrastructure, the new artist must create a buzz for themselves which takes valuable time away from writing or performing. Today's artist is working around the clock trying to penetrate a diluted market.
For writers, this also applies to the manner in which we approach agents and the publishing business. A writer must write compelling material, but must also rise above the masses just to speak with an agent. Developing marketing collateral is vitally important to gain the attention of a prospective agent or publisher in this highly competitive environment. It is an indicator of both personal commitment and potential success.
So, what does this mean? I believe it signals changes in attitude for everyone on the lower end of the distribution curve. Writers cannot afford to approach the market with a superstar attitude. Today's writer is more likely to mow their own lawn and buy Girl Scout Cookies, rather than live in a 10,000 sq ft. home in Beverly Hills surrounded by a security fence.
Monday, January 31, 2011
Indie film and marketing
I love the movies. However, in recent years, I have more interest in independent film. Yes, I still enjoy the high end magic of Hollywood film making, but I have developed a taste for unique stories and some of the techniques that are now used by indie film makers. I don't think I'm the only one.
Three independent film channels are now available on Comcast (IFC, Sundance and INDIE). In addition, Robert Redford, founder of The Sundance Film Festival, said that 45 films were sold following the 2011 Fest, up from 14 in 2010. He cites a growing public interest in independent film. Redford Relieved This Year's Sundance Is Ending.
For independent film makers, this is good news. Hopefully, this trend will result in an expanded market for independent film makers and many of those who work to support independent film, including songwriters and writers.
Last year, I worked on a short film project. I wanted to explore the possibilities for creating video to help promote writers, aspiring actors and independent music. Again, I don't think I'm alone.
Thousands of people are now creating entertaining videos and posting them online. Justin Bieber launched a successful career from a viral video. Also, video has become a viable marketing tool that also has applications outside of entertainment. For example, I am currently working with a non-profit organization to help produce video that we hope will raise the awareness of PACT, Inc. PACT provides valuable resources to families with disabled children, requiring private donations to supplement diminishing public support.
Video has also become a popular way for writers to promote themselves. Some writers are creating trailers like the previews for movies. These trailers help to raise the awareness for their unsold manuscripts. In short, many new opportunities now exist for self promotion.
Three independent film channels are now available on Comcast (IFC, Sundance and INDIE). In addition, Robert Redford, founder of The Sundance Film Festival, said that 45 films were sold following the 2011 Fest, up from 14 in 2010. He cites a growing public interest in independent film. Redford Relieved This Year's Sundance Is Ending.
For independent film makers, this is good news. Hopefully, this trend will result in an expanded market for independent film makers and many of those who work to support independent film, including songwriters and writers.
Last year, I worked on a short film project. I wanted to explore the possibilities for creating video to help promote writers, aspiring actors and independent music. Again, I don't think I'm alone.
Thousands of people are now creating entertaining videos and posting them online. Justin Bieber launched a successful career from a viral video. Also, video has become a viable marketing tool that also has applications outside of entertainment. For example, I am currently working with a non-profit organization to help produce video that we hope will raise the awareness of PACT, Inc. PACT provides valuable resources to families with disabled children, requiring private donations to supplement diminishing public support.
Video has also become a popular way for writers to promote themselves. Some writers are creating trailers like the previews for movies. These trailers help to raise the awareness for their unsold manuscripts. In short, many new opportunities now exist for self promotion.
Sunday, January 30, 2011
KINYARWANDA wins World Audience Award at Sundance!
Congratulations to Alrick Brown and everyone associated with the film Kinyarwanda after winning the Sundance World Audience Award. A member of my writer's group, Charles Plath contributed to this film and I am especially happy for him.
"At the time of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, the Mufti of Rwanda, the most respected Muslim leader in the country, issued a fatwa forbidding Muslims from participating in the killing of the Tutsi. As the country became a slaughterhouse, mosques became places of refuge where Muslims and Christians, Hutus and Tutsis came together to protect each other. KINYARWANDA is based on true accounts from survivors who took refuge at the Grand Mosque of Kigali and the madrassa of Nyanza. It recounts how the Imams opened the doors of the mosques to give refuge to the Tutsi and those Hutu who refused to participate in the killing."
The message of this film is powerful and could not come at a better time. All people should learn from this valuable lesson of love and tolerance in a world of hate. Please check out the website at KINYARWANDAMOVIE.COM.
"At the time of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, the Mufti of Rwanda, the most respected Muslim leader in the country, issued a fatwa forbidding Muslims from participating in the killing of the Tutsi. As the country became a slaughterhouse, mosques became places of refuge where Muslims and Christians, Hutus and Tutsis came together to protect each other. KINYARWANDA is based on true accounts from survivors who took refuge at the Grand Mosque of Kigali and the madrassa of Nyanza. It recounts how the Imams opened the doors of the mosques to give refuge to the Tutsi and those Hutu who refused to participate in the killing."
The message of this film is powerful and could not come at a better time. All people should learn from this valuable lesson of love and tolerance in a world of hate. Please check out the website at KINYARWANDAMOVIE.COM.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Draft first pages
The writer's group offered some very good comments on my first chapter last night. Originally, I planned to include a Preface with an overview of the book along with my reasons for writing it. After receiving many requests from the group, I realize an overview should be part of the main body of the book. Besides, a lot of folks skip over the Preface. So, I will attach the draft version of my Introduction to this post.
INTRODUCTION
The process of creating a story and writing a novel can be intimidating. We all have a story to tell, but the development process seems needlessly shrouded in mystery. At least, that was my perspective prior to writing my fiction novel, Box of Dreams.
I have over 20 years experience in engineering, project management and new business development, but I am also a writer. I know, I know, you are probably saying, “Well.... that’s just crazy talk! Engineers don’t write novels!” Not so fast there, Mr. Liberal Arts Major! Kurt Vonnegut studied mechanical engineering at the Carnegie Institute of Technology and the University of Tennessee. He also looked a little bit like Albert Einstein.
Holistic Approach
Writing is not pure art. That is, writing involves a process. On the other hand, writing is certainly not pure science. The process of writing is a combination of art, science and nature. It has a conceptual phase, a development phase and an execution phase, all bound by a particular environment, much like a project in the business world. It involves all of the brain. Having wonderful, creative ideas is simply not enough without a process. Understanding process is simply not enough without creative ideas.
In business or engineering, a successful project begins with a conceptual phase of development in which ideas are allowed to flow freely. It often involves brainstorming, which is a process of tossing ideas around until a viable solution begins to form.
This approach is used frequently in the automobile industry. It is the integration of art and engineering. Furthermore, designers may begin with a particular body style, which is an art form. The body style might determine the space requirements for designing the interior of the car as well as the mechanical aspects. So, the overall design of the car may be confined to limitations of space, due primarily to aesthetics.
Building design often follows a similar process of art and engineering. An architect may begin with an overall building design that is both interesting and pleasing to the eye. The structural engineer must then find a way to design within the overall parameters set by the architect. Keep in mind, if the architect’s design does not consider the principles of physics or market conditions, then the project will likely fail. If the structural engineer does not work within the confines of the architectural design, then beams stick out of windows and the whole thing just gets ugly!
Writing a book is very similar. During the early stages of a story, concepts may be shaped like clay before a writer must commit valuable time to further development. In addition, design and scheduling techniques may be used to develop a compelling story.
I demonstrate my unique process for integrating the craft of writing with engineering and business and apply it directly to writing my novel. It worked for me and it can work for you. I also provide an example by which you might develop your own unique process. After all, it is your thought process that is most important.
About the Book
In this book, I describe the steps used for writing my fiction story, “Box of Dreams”, using very specific examples that follow each stage of manuscript development. Perhaps more importantly, I share a method I developed specifically for developing and writing my story. I also describe the most fundamental elements of writing and share my thoughts on the writing business. Finally, I describe how I developed my unique method and suggest steps for tailoring your own process to your specific needs.
I kept copious notes while writing “Box of Dreams”. My intent was to record the information obtained along with the individual steps for writing my manuscript in case I might want to follow a similar process at some point in the future.
I was fearful of forgetting what I had learned because some of the information was very new to me. Also, I had struggled to find a single source of information that addressed all of my questions concerning the writing process and the business of writing.
After completing my fifth revision, I realized I had collected a respectable amount of information consisting of my methods and my research into the topic of writing. In addition, I realized I had a compelling story and that my process could be used by others.
This application is presented in very plain language, but it is also condensed and arranged into a logical sequence that I believe will help an aspiring writer to better understand the process of writing. It is, in essence, a roadmap through a variety of issues that writers face with a particular method that I developed as a tool to help simplify the process. Stated differently, it is a perspective of an aspiring writer approaching a venerated profession, which has value as a unique point of view.
Organization
This book is organized to reveal the simultaneous development of my process and book in chronological order. I will begin with a little about my writing background. Then, I will provide the initial inspiration for writing “Box of Dreams” which is a short story entitled “The Vase”. From there, I will describe each element used to develop the story while referencing some of my resources. These elements will be introduced separately but will continue development throughout the book. Finally, I will describe the editing process and begin to offer the results of my research on a variety of topics related to the writing business.
INTRODUCTION
The process of creating a story and writing a novel can be intimidating. We all have a story to tell, but the development process seems needlessly shrouded in mystery. At least, that was my perspective prior to writing my fiction novel, Box of Dreams.
I have over 20 years experience in engineering, project management and new business development, but I am also a writer. I know, I know, you are probably saying, “Well.... that’s just crazy talk! Engineers don’t write novels!” Not so fast there, Mr. Liberal Arts Major! Kurt Vonnegut studied mechanical engineering at the Carnegie Institute of Technology and the University of Tennessee. He also looked a little bit like Albert Einstein.
Holistic Approach
Writing is not pure art. That is, writing involves a process. On the other hand, writing is certainly not pure science. The process of writing is a combination of art, science and nature. It has a conceptual phase, a development phase and an execution phase, all bound by a particular environment, much like a project in the business world. It involves all of the brain. Having wonderful, creative ideas is simply not enough without a process. Understanding process is simply not enough without creative ideas.
In business or engineering, a successful project begins with a conceptual phase of development in which ideas are allowed to flow freely. It often involves brainstorming, which is a process of tossing ideas around until a viable solution begins to form.
This approach is used frequently in the automobile industry. It is the integration of art and engineering. Furthermore, designers may begin with a particular body style, which is an art form. The body style might determine the space requirements for designing the interior of the car as well as the mechanical aspects. So, the overall design of the car may be confined to limitations of space, due primarily to aesthetics.
Building design often follows a similar process of art and engineering. An architect may begin with an overall building design that is both interesting and pleasing to the eye. The structural engineer must then find a way to design within the overall parameters set by the architect. Keep in mind, if the architect’s design does not consider the principles of physics or market conditions, then the project will likely fail. If the structural engineer does not work within the confines of the architectural design, then beams stick out of windows and the whole thing just gets ugly!
Writing a book is very similar. During the early stages of a story, concepts may be shaped like clay before a writer must commit valuable time to further development. In addition, design and scheduling techniques may be used to develop a compelling story.
I demonstrate my unique process for integrating the craft of writing with engineering and business and apply it directly to writing my novel. It worked for me and it can work for you. I also provide an example by which you might develop your own unique process. After all, it is your thought process that is most important.
About the Book
In this book, I describe the steps used for writing my fiction story, “Box of Dreams”, using very specific examples that follow each stage of manuscript development. Perhaps more importantly, I share a method I developed specifically for developing and writing my story. I also describe the most fundamental elements of writing and share my thoughts on the writing business. Finally, I describe how I developed my unique method and suggest steps for tailoring your own process to your specific needs.
I kept copious notes while writing “Box of Dreams”. My intent was to record the information obtained along with the individual steps for writing my manuscript in case I might want to follow a similar process at some point in the future.
I was fearful of forgetting what I had learned because some of the information was very new to me. Also, I had struggled to find a single source of information that addressed all of my questions concerning the writing process and the business of writing.
After completing my fifth revision, I realized I had collected a respectable amount of information consisting of my methods and my research into the topic of writing. In addition, I realized I had a compelling story and that my process could be used by others.
This application is presented in very plain language, but it is also condensed and arranged into a logical sequence that I believe will help an aspiring writer to better understand the process of writing. It is, in essence, a roadmap through a variety of issues that writers face with a particular method that I developed as a tool to help simplify the process. Stated differently, it is a perspective of an aspiring writer approaching a venerated profession, which has value as a unique point of view.
Organization
This book is organized to reveal the simultaneous development of my process and book in chronological order. I will begin with a little about my writing background. Then, I will provide the initial inspiration for writing “Box of Dreams” which is a short story entitled “The Vase”. From there, I will describe each element used to develop the story while referencing some of my resources. These elements will be introduced separately but will continue development throughout the book. Finally, I will describe the editing process and begin to offer the results of my research on a variety of topics related to the writing business.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
To do lists and productivity
Yesterday was a very productive day. I wrote a new draft chapter about developing a premise for a long story. I also rewrote my original short story, "The Vase", which was the inspiration for writing the longer story. I've changed it to present tense and improved the language from the original, which was really a draft as I had forgotten to go back and edit it. I reposted it on this blog. Hey, I'm not complaining. I like having a lot of writing on my to-do list. As for my non-writing to-do list, I actually knocked a few items off yesterday as well. I repaired some trim molding on a kitchen cabinet and finished the repaired sheetrock where a handrail pushed through the wall over the holidays. Actually, I stumbled while carrying Rufus, our new Shih Tzu puppy, up the stairs. Rufus is completely traumatized by the incident and refuses to go up or down the stairs now. Add carrying the dog up and down the stairs to my list.
This morning I woke up around 3:30 a.m. and had a few thoughts about my first chapter as well as a new draft chapter. If the mood strikes, I try to take advantage of it. Besides, I went to bed early last night, so I feel rested. It is now 6:45 and I have a revised first chapter along with a new chapter on nodes. In all, I have six draft chapters and a Preface written.
When the publisher asked for a few more sample chapters, it was not immediately clear to me that I needed to draft most of the book before submitting the additional chapters. But, now it seems like a good idea. Why? I think it makes sense to get a draft of most of the chapters to avoid redundancy and to improve the overall flow of the work. The notes I kept for the fiction work is detailed in places but my outline for the non-fiction is general. I suppose I could go back and attempt a more detailed outline, but it is sometimes fun to just sit down and write what I want to say. I can always make revisions, but the flow is what I am after. I want the non-fiction book to be readable and maybe a little bit entertaining. This was the method used for the initial two chapters that were included in the book proposal, so I would like to maintain the same feel if possible. Stated differently, I don't want it to read as a data dump of facts. I would much rather put it into a conversational context.
I also had some ideas about retitling the book as well as a few of the chapters. I'm thinking "Write of Way" as a potential title with chapters with names like "Writes of Passage". I'll kick it around. Ultimately, it matters little what I think. I am open to suggestions from the publishing folks. Gotta go wake up David, carry the puppy down the stairs, make coffee, etc.
This morning I woke up around 3:30 a.m. and had a few thoughts about my first chapter as well as a new draft chapter. If the mood strikes, I try to take advantage of it. Besides, I went to bed early last night, so I feel rested. It is now 6:45 and I have a revised first chapter along with a new chapter on nodes. In all, I have six draft chapters and a Preface written.
When the publisher asked for a few more sample chapters, it was not immediately clear to me that I needed to draft most of the book before submitting the additional chapters. But, now it seems like a good idea. Why? I think it makes sense to get a draft of most of the chapters to avoid redundancy and to improve the overall flow of the work. The notes I kept for the fiction work is detailed in places but my outline for the non-fiction is general. I suppose I could go back and attempt a more detailed outline, but it is sometimes fun to just sit down and write what I want to say. I can always make revisions, but the flow is what I am after. I want the non-fiction book to be readable and maybe a little bit entertaining. This was the method used for the initial two chapters that were included in the book proposal, so I would like to maintain the same feel if possible. Stated differently, I don't want it to read as a data dump of facts. I would much rather put it into a conversational context.
I also had some ideas about retitling the book as well as a few of the chapters. I'm thinking "Write of Way" as a potential title with chapters with names like "Writes of Passage". I'll kick it around. Ultimately, it matters little what I think. I am open to suggestions from the publishing folks. Gotta go wake up David, carry the puppy down the stairs, make coffee, etc.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Lessons in writing and the writing business
As I indicated yesterday, I kept copious notes as I wrote my fiction manuscript. I wanted to have a record so I might gain from the overall experience. I expected I would eventually choose the elements of greater value and dismiss those elements or steps that did not work or that produced unsatisfactory results.
I am now going back and reviewing my notes along with books and articles that had an influence on me. I believe my expectation was correct. In short, I did make mistakes, but I was very fortunate to find a wealth of information as well as many valuable techniques. My intent is to condense this information as I believe it will be very useful for other aspiring writers.
In the meantime, I am finding even more value in the process of reviewing the materials used along the way. It is a summary of lessons learned, but also a review of the key elements that I found to be most valuable. Yes, there is a lot of information, but there was not a single source for the very specific information that I needed at the time. I realize that many of the issues that I faced are common as I talk among other aspiring writers. Perhaps there is a need for such a reference of common issues. I hope so.
Of course, I realize I am merely providing a road map that addresses very specific issues. It is not a substitute for greater experience and knowledge, but I think it is very fresh in my mind and quite possibly relevant to a new generation of writers. Furthermore, these fundamental elements of writing and the writing business offers the development of my manuscript as an example. As my fiction book nears completion, the results of my work shall become apparent. The success of my non-fiction book will likely rest on the success of my fiction book. However, if I fail, I will have something of value for my efforts. I will have an education in the craft of writing through the direct application of methods I plan to document for future use.
I am now going back and reviewing my notes along with books and articles that had an influence on me. I believe my expectation was correct. In short, I did make mistakes, but I was very fortunate to find a wealth of information as well as many valuable techniques. My intent is to condense this information as I believe it will be very useful for other aspiring writers.
In the meantime, I am finding even more value in the process of reviewing the materials used along the way. It is a summary of lessons learned, but also a review of the key elements that I found to be most valuable. Yes, there is a lot of information, but there was not a single source for the very specific information that I needed at the time. I realize that many of the issues that I faced are common as I talk among other aspiring writers. Perhaps there is a need for such a reference of common issues. I hope so.
Of course, I realize I am merely providing a road map that addresses very specific issues. It is not a substitute for greater experience and knowledge, but I think it is very fresh in my mind and quite possibly relevant to a new generation of writers. Furthermore, these fundamental elements of writing and the writing business offers the development of my manuscript as an example. As my fiction book nears completion, the results of my work shall become apparent. The success of my non-fiction book will likely rest on the success of my fiction book. However, if I fail, I will have something of value for my efforts. I will have an education in the craft of writing through the direct application of methods I plan to document for future use.
Monday, January 24, 2011
A busy weekend of writing and thinking and writing
I had a fairly productive weekend while David was at camp. I wrote a Preface and two draft chapters for my non-fiction project. But, I also continued to learn about the process.
After receiving word from Sourcebooks, I felt a sense of urgency to begin work. Writing takes time. Yes, I can produce something right away, but it pays to give myself time to ensure that I send high quality work.
Incidentally, going back and looking at a book proposal can be a little intimidating. I was uneasy until I had a chance to get my head around the concept once again. Luckily, I outlined the proposed chapters in my notes which were kept in a file. After opening the file, I quickly followed my line of thinking and was able to begin work immediately. If I decide to write another book proposal in the future, I think I'll use the same system for recording information which saved me a considerable amount of time. After spending a few days, I know I will be able to deliver what I had originally proposed.
I know that my draft chapters are only the beginning. I must go back and edit my work, but I must also give myself a little time to ensure that I have written to the best of my ability. Do I submit Revision One right away? No, I think it pays to ask for other opinions. By the way, my non-fiction book actually addresses this same point. I will take my first revisions (one chapter at a time) to my writer's group and ask for their comments. Do I want them to pat me on the back and tell me what a wonderful writer I am? Well, that would be nice. BUT, that is not the intent. The intent is to flush out potential issues.
I also address the use of professional editors in my non-fiction book. Should I go to a professional editor? I think it depends on my confidence level once I have revised my work a second or maybe a third time.
There was another benefit to beginning this process right away. I actually had a few additional ideas while in the shower this morning. While it may not be the same for other writers, I like to allow a little "breathing" room while writing. That is, I like to give myself time to organize my thoughts, which invariably results in more thoughts. Stated differently, putting down my initial thoughts in the form of a draft helps me to further refine my ideas. While thinking about my chapter on premise, I recalled an important event as I originally outlined my fiction manuscript, Box of Dreams (my non-fiction proposal is about the process I used to write the fiction manuscript). I had already begun writing the non-fiction chapter on premise, but now I will go back and add my thoughts, which I believe will result in a more compelling description of my process.
As a side note, I also had a little time to think about how the news from Friday might impact my blog. This blog will continue to follow the development of "Box of Dreams" but will now also follow the development of "Writing Between the Nodes". I think it might be fun to post the steps along the way. In fact, this blog may actually become an integral part of the non-fiction work.
By the way, I hope folks will consider following this blog. By following, I mean click on the follow button at the top right corner. I also welcome comments.
Cheers,
Del
After receiving word from Sourcebooks, I felt a sense of urgency to begin work. Writing takes time. Yes, I can produce something right away, but it pays to give myself time to ensure that I send high quality work.
Incidentally, going back and looking at a book proposal can be a little intimidating. I was uneasy until I had a chance to get my head around the concept once again. Luckily, I outlined the proposed chapters in my notes which were kept in a file. After opening the file, I quickly followed my line of thinking and was able to begin work immediately. If I decide to write another book proposal in the future, I think I'll use the same system for recording information which saved me a considerable amount of time. After spending a few days, I know I will be able to deliver what I had originally proposed.
I know that my draft chapters are only the beginning. I must go back and edit my work, but I must also give myself a little time to ensure that I have written to the best of my ability. Do I submit Revision One right away? No, I think it pays to ask for other opinions. By the way, my non-fiction book actually addresses this same point. I will take my first revisions (one chapter at a time) to my writer's group and ask for their comments. Do I want them to pat me on the back and tell me what a wonderful writer I am? Well, that would be nice. BUT, that is not the intent. The intent is to flush out potential issues.
I also address the use of professional editors in my non-fiction book. Should I go to a professional editor? I think it depends on my confidence level once I have revised my work a second or maybe a third time.
There was another benefit to beginning this process right away. I actually had a few additional ideas while in the shower this morning. While it may not be the same for other writers, I like to allow a little "breathing" room while writing. That is, I like to give myself time to organize my thoughts, which invariably results in more thoughts. Stated differently, putting down my initial thoughts in the form of a draft helps me to further refine my ideas. While thinking about my chapter on premise, I recalled an important event as I originally outlined my fiction manuscript, Box of Dreams (my non-fiction proposal is about the process I used to write the fiction manuscript). I had already begun writing the non-fiction chapter on premise, but now I will go back and add my thoughts, which I believe will result in a more compelling description of my process.
As a side note, I also had a little time to think about how the news from Friday might impact my blog. This blog will continue to follow the development of "Box of Dreams" but will now also follow the development of "Writing Between the Nodes". I think it might be fun to post the steps along the way. In fact, this blog may actually become an integral part of the non-fiction work.
By the way, I hope folks will consider following this blog. By following, I mean click on the follow button at the top right corner. I also welcome comments.
Cheers,
Del
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Milestone event
I received a note yesterday from the nice folks at Sourcebooks. I am very encouraged as they are looking for two additional chapters to accompany my previously submitted non-fiction proposal.
Wait a minute! Didn’t I mention the non-fiction proposal? I guess not. I submitted a non-fiction proposal to Sourcebooks as a companion book to my fiction book. The non-fiction book is tentatively entitled “Writing Between the Nodes” which is a method I developed while writing “Box of Dreams”. It is also a roadmap intended to help aspiring writers through the daunting task of writing a book. My intent is too provide an up-to-date helpful guide in very plain language, while citing references from my own research.
As for my earlier comments regarding my love for writing fiction, that still remains. But, it IS a proposed book ABOUT writing.
Ok, so I should offer a little explanation about book proposals. A book proposal is a general outline for a book idea that writers (mostly non-fiction) may submit to a publisher. In the case of Sourcebooks, they accept unagented book proposals for non-fiction. They do not usually accept unagented submissions for fiction (except in the romance genre). So, how do I know this? I looked at their website Sourcebooks.com.
Which brings me to my unagented submission for my fiction manuscript, “Box of Dreams”. Sourcebooks ran a promotion during the Summer for aspiring writers to purchase a book called "Publish This Book" by Stephen Markley . It is an interesting concept book written as a memoir but it also provides insights into the publishing business. I recommend it. Anyway, with the proof of purchase for the book, the purchaser could submit 5000 words from a manuscript for review. I bought the book and submitted 5000 words from my fiction manuscript and eventually received some positive comments back from Sourcebooks encouraging me to make a few revisions and send the whole manuscript.
The note I received yesterday offered more encouraging words for my manuscript. However, like the proposal, it is far from the point of acceptance. Furthermore, even with revisions, it may not fit into their targeted markets. I must revise the manuscript again. I will provide some details of my revisions in future postings. But for now, I am very pleased to have an opportunity to resubmit my manuscript and will likely turn to a professional editor for advice.
In short, there is much work to be done.
Wait a minute! Didn’t I mention the non-fiction proposal? I guess not. I submitted a non-fiction proposal to Sourcebooks as a companion book to my fiction book. The non-fiction book is tentatively entitled “Writing Between the Nodes” which is a method I developed while writing “Box of Dreams”. It is also a roadmap intended to help aspiring writers through the daunting task of writing a book. My intent is too provide an up-to-date helpful guide in very plain language, while citing references from my own research.
As for my earlier comments regarding my love for writing fiction, that still remains. But, it IS a proposed book ABOUT writing.
Ok, so I should offer a little explanation about book proposals. A book proposal is a general outline for a book idea that writers (mostly non-fiction) may submit to a publisher. In the case of Sourcebooks, they accept unagented book proposals for non-fiction. They do not usually accept unagented submissions for fiction (except in the romance genre). So, how do I know this? I looked at their website Sourcebooks.com.
Which brings me to my unagented submission for my fiction manuscript, “Box of Dreams”. Sourcebooks ran a promotion during the Summer for aspiring writers to purchase a book called "Publish This Book" by Stephen Markley . It is an interesting concept book written as a memoir but it also provides insights into the publishing business. I recommend it. Anyway, with the proof of purchase for the book, the purchaser could submit 5000 words from a manuscript for review. I bought the book and submitted 5000 words from my fiction manuscript and eventually received some positive comments back from Sourcebooks encouraging me to make a few revisions and send the whole manuscript.
The note I received yesterday offered more encouraging words for my manuscript. However, like the proposal, it is far from the point of acceptance. Furthermore, even with revisions, it may not fit into their targeted markets. I must revise the manuscript again. I will provide some details of my revisions in future postings. But for now, I am very pleased to have an opportunity to resubmit my manuscript and will likely turn to a professional editor for advice.
In short, there is much work to be done.
Friday, January 21, 2011
Some thoughts on finding an agent
A set of rules for approaching agents and publishers exists for writers. I have read a few books on the subject but the books do not provide definitive answers, at least not the books I am reading. They seem to contradict one another and really don’t provide a clearly cut path for approaching this seemingly convoluted business of agency.
Here’s the problem. Many will suggest that approaching an agent should be done one at a time. They also suggest researching agents who have a particular interest in the aspiring writer’s style of writing. This would not be so bad except for the length of time that a writer must wait before receiving a response from a prospective agent, if he or she receives anything at all. Agents may take months to reply to a query letter! This is apparently due to the number of query letters they receive daily. What does that mean? It means that a query letter must be painstakingly written to stand out above the crowd. After all, writers should know how to write, right? Not so fast. A query letter is not easy for any writer to construct. It has elements of style, yes, but it should also consider marketing techniques. It is a one shot deal on a single page that lets the agent know who you are, what you have written, and the ever important answer to the question, does it have a snowball’s chance in hell for generating a profit?
Okay, so you have perused all of the magazines, read articles and books, and have now developed a short list of potential agents. That is great! There is yet another step and that is to determine if the agents are accepting query letters. For that, you must go to their respective websites and read what they are accepting. By the way, I was surprised to find a whole new layer that exists below the agents. These are the screeners that will determine what their boss or client (the agent) will read and what they will not read. So, your first level of resistance may actually occur before your query letter reaches the agent. Here is a tip that I’ve seen written a few times. Treat everyone with respect. When you call and a secretary answers the phone, it pays to treat that person with the same respect and deference that you would show to the agent. Why? That person may be the first cut. That is, a secretary can destroy your efforts by simply not forwarding your information to the desired target. Of course, I think this is a good rule for life in general.
To further complicate matters, the whole publishing business landscape is changing rapidly. So what is so different? Publishers are much more selective toward manuscripts that have a higher probability of success. Coupled with fewer publishers, this raises the bar for writing a compelling query letter and a quality manuscript. At the same time, there are many who are pursuing the self publishing path. Although I do not believe it is entirely warranted, many independents regard publishers with distrust and resentment. What is the result? I think prospective writers are less willing to accept the traditional protocol for sending out queries one at a time. I believe folks are submitting multiple query letters to multiple agents.
While some may disagree, I think it is better to approach agents one at a time but to follow up in two weeks on each submission. Furthermore, I think placing a time requirement on an agent can have a negative impact on the chances for publishing a first manuscript. It is a small red flag that may indicate that a writer is not in the right frame of mind to navigate the whole publishing process. It also takes away from the strength of the query letter itself. It is a distraction. The query letter should be very compelling and should stand on it’s own merits, not force the issue with a prospective agent.
Personally, I think it is better to provide a reasonable amount of time between submissions. Not all agents will respond within two weeks, but I think it is a reasonable length of time to wait before following up with a call. A follow up call (or e-mail ONLY if the agent says it is ok) should be very professional and courteous. Ask if the agent has received the letter. Also, ask if the agent requires additional information. If you are connected directly to the agent, ask if he or she liked the query letter and if there is any interest. If not, simply ask why but do not expect to change anyone’s mind at this point. You have the information you were looking for and you now have every right to pursue other agents.
Yes, it is a long process, but I think taking a cautious approach makes sense. Why? Because it may be an indication of the strength of your query. Think of it this way. If your query is not that compelling, do you really want to broadcast it to every agent that may have an interest in your manuscript? I think the answer is no. You would be much better off to approach agents one at a time and make note of feedback along the way. Stated differently, you have not burned all of your bridges to those agents who may be in the best position to help you. You can make adjustments along the way that will improve your chances in the long run. Besides, submitting a query letter can offer a little closer access to the agent. Use the time wisely. Find out a little as you go and you might be surprised at the benefits that you receive.
Here’s the problem. Many will suggest that approaching an agent should be done one at a time. They also suggest researching agents who have a particular interest in the aspiring writer’s style of writing. This would not be so bad except for the length of time that a writer must wait before receiving a response from a prospective agent, if he or she receives anything at all. Agents may take months to reply to a query letter! This is apparently due to the number of query letters they receive daily. What does that mean? It means that a query letter must be painstakingly written to stand out above the crowd. After all, writers should know how to write, right? Not so fast. A query letter is not easy for any writer to construct. It has elements of style, yes, but it should also consider marketing techniques. It is a one shot deal on a single page that lets the agent know who you are, what you have written, and the ever important answer to the question, does it have a snowball’s chance in hell for generating a profit?
Okay, so you have perused all of the magazines, read articles and books, and have now developed a short list of potential agents. That is great! There is yet another step and that is to determine if the agents are accepting query letters. For that, you must go to their respective websites and read what they are accepting. By the way, I was surprised to find a whole new layer that exists below the agents. These are the screeners that will determine what their boss or client (the agent) will read and what they will not read. So, your first level of resistance may actually occur before your query letter reaches the agent. Here is a tip that I’ve seen written a few times. Treat everyone with respect. When you call and a secretary answers the phone, it pays to treat that person with the same respect and deference that you would show to the agent. Why? That person may be the first cut. That is, a secretary can destroy your efforts by simply not forwarding your information to the desired target. Of course, I think this is a good rule for life in general.
To further complicate matters, the whole publishing business landscape is changing rapidly. So what is so different? Publishers are much more selective toward manuscripts that have a higher probability of success. Coupled with fewer publishers, this raises the bar for writing a compelling query letter and a quality manuscript. At the same time, there are many who are pursuing the self publishing path. Although I do not believe it is entirely warranted, many independents regard publishers with distrust and resentment. What is the result? I think prospective writers are less willing to accept the traditional protocol for sending out queries one at a time. I believe folks are submitting multiple query letters to multiple agents.
While some may disagree, I think it is better to approach agents one at a time but to follow up in two weeks on each submission. Furthermore, I think placing a time requirement on an agent can have a negative impact on the chances for publishing a first manuscript. It is a small red flag that may indicate that a writer is not in the right frame of mind to navigate the whole publishing process. It also takes away from the strength of the query letter itself. It is a distraction. The query letter should be very compelling and should stand on it’s own merits, not force the issue with a prospective agent.
Personally, I think it is better to provide a reasonable amount of time between submissions. Not all agents will respond within two weeks, but I think it is a reasonable length of time to wait before following up with a call. A follow up call (or e-mail ONLY if the agent says it is ok) should be very professional and courteous. Ask if the agent has received the letter. Also, ask if the agent requires additional information. If you are connected directly to the agent, ask if he or she liked the query letter and if there is any interest. If not, simply ask why but do not expect to change anyone’s mind at this point. You have the information you were looking for and you now have every right to pursue other agents.
Yes, it is a long process, but I think taking a cautious approach makes sense. Why? Because it may be an indication of the strength of your query. Think of it this way. If your query is not that compelling, do you really want to broadcast it to every agent that may have an interest in your manuscript? I think the answer is no. You would be much better off to approach agents one at a time and make note of feedback along the way. Stated differently, you have not burned all of your bridges to those agents who may be in the best position to help you. You can make adjustments along the way that will improve your chances in the long run. Besides, submitting a query letter can offer a little closer access to the agent. Use the time wisely. Find out a little as you go and you might be surprised at the benefits that you receive.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
Educational with entertainment value
I am confronted by a great mystery. That is, what does an aspiring writer put on a blog about publishing?
While it may seem abundantly clear that one would share the experience of publishing on a regular basis, there is a problem. That problem is the long amount of time that an aspiring writer must wait between steps. So, my plan is to provide my thoughts on a variety of relevant topics associated with getting a book published between the milestone events. Those topics will include the daily frustrations, my observations about the business, commentary on the elements of writing, samples of my writing and eventually....an actual milestone event. Of course, the milestone event might send me reeling in exasperation for not having accomplished my desired goal. That is, an event may be a rejection letter or a particularly nasty critique. So be it. I will report my experience, no matter how it might appear to the average reader. And you, my dear reader, can witness it all first hand without risking your neck. Hopefully, that is the value that I might offer.
Building a blog means getting folks to read it. That takes well placed resources, including time. I will make mistakes. But, I will hopefully learn from those mistakes. An ongoing account of activities could include my assessment of mistakes and lessons learned. So, I hope that I can provide an objective account of my routine with humility and grace. We’ll see what happens. I might have an online hissy fit and break something.....who knows.
Then, at some point, I must provide something of greater value to the reader. I must provide some sample of my fiction. I think it makes sense to offer something entertaining and compelling to those who might take a few minutes to read this blog. It is all I can offer really. It is my hope that samples of my work might generate interest over time. The small portion of my brain that deals with reality tells me there is a risk of not generating interest. Fortunately, that is offset by the larger part of my brain that is idealistic and creative. It says, go for it! Make a damn fool of yourself online! I don’t care. (Actually, I do care, but I will pretend not to care if that is ok)
So, it is my intention to provide maybe a small amount of entertainment as I progress. Self-deprecating, embarrassing stuff that no sane person would reveal about themselves....all right here in the coming weeks! So, please tune in and see if I will self destruct or maybe.....just maybe.....get a lucky break.
While it may seem abundantly clear that one would share the experience of publishing on a regular basis, there is a problem. That problem is the long amount of time that an aspiring writer must wait between steps. So, my plan is to provide my thoughts on a variety of relevant topics associated with getting a book published between the milestone events. Those topics will include the daily frustrations, my observations about the business, commentary on the elements of writing, samples of my writing and eventually....an actual milestone event. Of course, the milestone event might send me reeling in exasperation for not having accomplished my desired goal. That is, an event may be a rejection letter or a particularly nasty critique. So be it. I will report my experience, no matter how it might appear to the average reader. And you, my dear reader, can witness it all first hand without risking your neck. Hopefully, that is the value that I might offer.
Building a blog means getting folks to read it. That takes well placed resources, including time. I will make mistakes. But, I will hopefully learn from those mistakes. An ongoing account of activities could include my assessment of mistakes and lessons learned. So, I hope that I can provide an objective account of my routine with humility and grace. We’ll see what happens. I might have an online hissy fit and break something.....who knows.
Then, at some point, I must provide something of greater value to the reader. I must provide some sample of my fiction. I think it makes sense to offer something entertaining and compelling to those who might take a few minutes to read this blog. It is all I can offer really. It is my hope that samples of my work might generate interest over time. The small portion of my brain that deals with reality tells me there is a risk of not generating interest. Fortunately, that is offset by the larger part of my brain that is idealistic and creative. It says, go for it! Make a damn fool of yourself online! I don’t care. (Actually, I do care, but I will pretend not to care if that is ok)
So, it is my intention to provide maybe a small amount of entertainment as I progress. Self-deprecating, embarrassing stuff that no sane person would reveal about themselves....all right here in the coming weeks! So, please tune in and see if I will self destruct or maybe.....just maybe.....get a lucky break.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
From webmaster to author
It began as a conversation with my programmer son and his programmer girlfriend. It was an idea to develop a website for songwriters with a radio station for airing independent music. While I hoped that bluemusepublishing.com would generate sufficient income to support itself, I also wanted to create a collaborative environment for various artists. In retrospect, it was an idea that was bigger than the resources available to sustain it.
Admittedly, I knew very little about creating a website, but I had this notion that a website need only provide some value and it would grow. I was in for a big surprise. Marketing on the internet is far more than purchasing a domain name and finding a suitable host.
On the positive side, I had over 400 members with over 1000 uploaded original songs. I had a 3/10 Google rating (not too shabby for this type of website) and was showing up near the top in a variety of search strings. Also, a few of "my" artists have been discovered since joining my site.
It was an exciting journey and I did learn a lot along the way. Certainly, gaining a cursory understanding of the various languages associated with creating a website has value. With that comes an appreciation for those who work as developers/programmers every day. Yes, HTML, XML, and CSS are relatively easy to understand individually. However, the combination of languages must be integrated. One must also understand PHP, MySQL, AJAX, Java, and Javascript. If you want to have your own server, it pays to understand Apache.
But wait....there's more. It is vitally important to understand Search Engine Optimization or SEO. In short, SEO consists of the new rules of online marketing and publicity. For someone who spent some time in marketing, it is fascinating, but far too complex to discuss in a blog. In fact, it is not possible to describe as the rules change everyday. It honestly requires full time dedication to maintain a level of competency in this dynamic field.
SEO is the key to growing a website organically. I learned to write articles and press releases, all designed to draw attention to a website. I also learned to create a sitemap and to maintain consistency with keywords and content. It makes a difference.
There is a vast online culture that must be recognized and respected. Using various techniques such as "black hat SEO" can hurt your ratings. It can also draw the wrong attention from any number of internet purists who poo poo on flagrant self promotion. One must learn how to create networks and generate some reciprocity. That is, it is necessary to have other sites directing attention to your site. It is similar to the ground game for publicity but also vastly different.
One must have a presence outside of one's website. It is important to have content on blogs, podcasts and YouTube. All of these can point back to a website and provide "juice". I recently told a friend, it is like a tank with water pouring in (analogous to links pointing to your site) and water pouring out (analogous to links on your site that point to another site) at the same time. You want to have more water pouring in than pouring out to build ratings.
Creating podcasts, videos and writing articles are all a lot of fun. But, I must credit this whole roundabout journey through cyberspace for helping to find my true passion. Yep, you guessed it. Writing fiction. While non-fiction can be enjoyable in small doses, it is a bit claustrophobic for me. I feel confined by facts. I enjoy writing without boundaries with much less regard for reality. Perhaps I should have taken heed of the accusations made by my peers long ago when they told me I wasn't in touch with reality. Hell, I never WANTED to be in touch with reality! It has taken me 53 years and a now defunct website to realize what my friends were trying to tell me long ago.
Admittedly, I knew very little about creating a website, but I had this notion that a website need only provide some value and it would grow. I was in for a big surprise. Marketing on the internet is far more than purchasing a domain name and finding a suitable host.
On the positive side, I had over 400 members with over 1000 uploaded original songs. I had a 3/10 Google rating (not too shabby for this type of website) and was showing up near the top in a variety of search strings. Also, a few of "my" artists have been discovered since joining my site.
It was an exciting journey and I did learn a lot along the way. Certainly, gaining a cursory understanding of the various languages associated with creating a website has value. With that comes an appreciation for those who work as developers/programmers every day. Yes, HTML, XML, and CSS are relatively easy to understand individually. However, the combination of languages must be integrated. One must also understand PHP, MySQL, AJAX, Java, and Javascript. If you want to have your own server, it pays to understand Apache.
But wait....there's more. It is vitally important to understand Search Engine Optimization or SEO. In short, SEO consists of the new rules of online marketing and publicity. For someone who spent some time in marketing, it is fascinating, but far too complex to discuss in a blog. In fact, it is not possible to describe as the rules change everyday. It honestly requires full time dedication to maintain a level of competency in this dynamic field.
SEO is the key to growing a website organically. I learned to write articles and press releases, all designed to draw attention to a website. I also learned to create a sitemap and to maintain consistency with keywords and content. It makes a difference.
There is a vast online culture that must be recognized and respected. Using various techniques such as "black hat SEO" can hurt your ratings. It can also draw the wrong attention from any number of internet purists who poo poo on flagrant self promotion. One must learn how to create networks and generate some reciprocity. That is, it is necessary to have other sites directing attention to your site. It is similar to the ground game for publicity but also vastly different.
One must have a presence outside of one's website. It is important to have content on blogs, podcasts and YouTube. All of these can point back to a website and provide "juice". I recently told a friend, it is like a tank with water pouring in (analogous to links pointing to your site) and water pouring out (analogous to links on your site that point to another site) at the same time. You want to have more water pouring in than pouring out to build ratings.
Creating podcasts, videos and writing articles are all a lot of fun. But, I must credit this whole roundabout journey through cyberspace for helping to find my true passion. Yep, you guessed it. Writing fiction. While non-fiction can be enjoyable in small doses, it is a bit claustrophobic for me. I feel confined by facts. I enjoy writing without boundaries with much less regard for reality. Perhaps I should have taken heed of the accusations made by my peers long ago when they told me I wasn't in touch with reality. Hell, I never WANTED to be in touch with reality! It has taken me 53 years and a now defunct website to realize what my friends were trying to tell me long ago.
Monday, January 17, 2011
Forward momentum
These days, I think it is necessary to maintain forward momentum in a long story. We all have shorter attention spans and it is not surprising that successful writers use a variety of techniques to keep the pages turning.
I tend to read a combination of contemporary books, non-fiction and classics. Some of the best classics are difficult for a contemporary reader, as the story sometimes requires a lot of time to unfold in comparison to contemporary novels. I love Ernest Hemmingway, but "For Whom the Bell Tolls" takes a long time to develop by today's standards. It requires some patience to read some of the classics, as we have all come to expect rapid development from the beginning of a story.
Short stories often employ a technique called "in medias res", which means "into the middle of things". Nowadays, novels also use this technique to create a "hook". Dan Brown uses this technique in his mega bestseller, "The Da Vinci Code". The principle character, Robert Langdon, is developed very quickly by way of introduction to a conference at which he is scheduled to speak. He is immediately thrust into the action as a curator is murdered at the Louvre and he becomes a suspect.
There are other techniques for maintaining forward momentum. Creating tension or conflict is desirable as a method for building momentum. However, it is built on many layers. The main story arc requires that a main conflict NOT be resolved until the end of the story. So, it is also necessary to create and to resolve smaller conflicts along the way. This technique is used by most contemporary authors today. James Patterson uses it very effectively.
Some conflicts may be extended with a technique of switching between scenes. This is often done with parallel story lines, involving different characters. For example, a conflict may be developed and built up at the end of a chapter, but the following chapter begins a new scene. These chapters or scenes may be alternated for maximum effect, but like many techniques, too much can also be too much. I believe it is a balance. Some parts of a story require the insertion of forward momentum techniques more than others. It depends very much on the progression of a story.
Another technique is to write short chapters. Both Dan Brown and James Patterson use this technique very well. It provides more opportunities for building and resolving conflict but it has a psychological effect on the reader as well. It provides frequent breaks that encourage a reader to move into a new chapter, whereas long chapters can leave a reader looking for a good stopping point. So why is this a problem? A writer cannot afford distractions. Anything that distracts a reader is diminishing the forward momentum of the story. Looking for a good stopping point is a distraction.
I attempt to use many of these techniques to keep the reader interested in "Box of Dreams". I believe it is one of the strengths of my story, along with an array of strong characters. But, the ultimate measure of my forward momentum techniques and character development rests with an editor's assessment of my work.
I tend to read a combination of contemporary books, non-fiction and classics. Some of the best classics are difficult for a contemporary reader, as the story sometimes requires a lot of time to unfold in comparison to contemporary novels. I love Ernest Hemmingway, but "For Whom the Bell Tolls" takes a long time to develop by today's standards. It requires some patience to read some of the classics, as we have all come to expect rapid development from the beginning of a story.
Short stories often employ a technique called "in medias res", which means "into the middle of things". Nowadays, novels also use this technique to create a "hook". Dan Brown uses this technique in his mega bestseller, "The Da Vinci Code". The principle character, Robert Langdon, is developed very quickly by way of introduction to a conference at which he is scheduled to speak. He is immediately thrust into the action as a curator is murdered at the Louvre and he becomes a suspect.
There are other techniques for maintaining forward momentum. Creating tension or conflict is desirable as a method for building momentum. However, it is built on many layers. The main story arc requires that a main conflict NOT be resolved until the end of the story. So, it is also necessary to create and to resolve smaller conflicts along the way. This technique is used by most contemporary authors today. James Patterson uses it very effectively.
Some conflicts may be extended with a technique of switching between scenes. This is often done with parallel story lines, involving different characters. For example, a conflict may be developed and built up at the end of a chapter, but the following chapter begins a new scene. These chapters or scenes may be alternated for maximum effect, but like many techniques, too much can also be too much. I believe it is a balance. Some parts of a story require the insertion of forward momentum techniques more than others. It depends very much on the progression of a story.
Another technique is to write short chapters. Both Dan Brown and James Patterson use this technique very well. It provides more opportunities for building and resolving conflict but it has a psychological effect on the reader as well. It provides frequent breaks that encourage a reader to move into a new chapter, whereas long chapters can leave a reader looking for a good stopping point. So why is this a problem? A writer cannot afford distractions. Anything that distracts a reader is diminishing the forward momentum of the story. Looking for a good stopping point is a distraction.
I attempt to use many of these techniques to keep the reader interested in "Box of Dreams". I believe it is one of the strengths of my story, along with an array of strong characters. But, the ultimate measure of my forward momentum techniques and character development rests with an editor's assessment of my work.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Some thoughts about editing
Self editing was a challenge for me. But, I'm learning to appreciate the editing process. Why? Most importantly, it helps to refine writing skills. While it requires a lot of time, it is the 90% perspiration that comes after the 10% inspiration.
I think it is also healthy to recognize that self editing is only the beginning of the editing process. There are independent editors who will help to identify problems with a manuscript. I am open to using an independent editor, but it also pays to find an independent editor who can help move a career forward. Then, there are editors who work for the publisher. This is the final steps before a book is formatted for printing. Just to be clear, publishers do want clean copy, but most manuscripts do require editing.
Since writing the draft manuscript, I have removed most of the original basis for the story which is the short story entitled The Vase. This may seem odd, but in this particular case, the short story no longer advanced the story line that evolved. It became a distraction for the reader, so I took it out. The story reads much better and the first 50 pages are now very specific to developing the principle characters of the story. The value of the original short story remains. It was the impetus for developing the larger story and it remains a stand alone short story.
Similarly, I created a very detailed backstory about Art's great, great grandfather. This was written in the second revision as a prologue with an epilog at the end of the story to complete the backstory. This was eventually removed as it was not consistent with the mood of the main story. It was an important step nonetheless as it helped to develop the overall story, but it also revealed a bit too much, taking away some of the mystery.
I believe the main story line is now much stronger. Yes, it was painful to remove thousands of words, some of which were painstakingly crafted, but it did improve the forward momentum and overall style consistency of the main story.
The basic principle involved in the editing process can be described very easily. If it does not advance the story, take it out.
I think it is also healthy to recognize that self editing is only the beginning of the editing process. There are independent editors who will help to identify problems with a manuscript. I am open to using an independent editor, but it also pays to find an independent editor who can help move a career forward. Then, there are editors who work for the publisher. This is the final steps before a book is formatted for printing. Just to be clear, publishers do want clean copy, but most manuscripts do require editing.
Since writing the draft manuscript, I have removed most of the original basis for the story which is the short story entitled The Vase. This may seem odd, but in this particular case, the short story no longer advanced the story line that evolved. It became a distraction for the reader, so I took it out. The story reads much better and the first 50 pages are now very specific to developing the principle characters of the story. The value of the original short story remains. It was the impetus for developing the larger story and it remains a stand alone short story.
Similarly, I created a very detailed backstory about Art's great, great grandfather. This was written in the second revision as a prologue with an epilog at the end of the story to complete the backstory. This was eventually removed as it was not consistent with the mood of the main story. It was an important step nonetheless as it helped to develop the overall story, but it also revealed a bit too much, taking away some of the mystery.
I believe the main story line is now much stronger. Yes, it was painful to remove thousands of words, some of which were painstakingly crafted, but it did improve the forward momentum and overall style consistency of the main story.
The basic principle involved in the editing process can be described very easily. If it does not advance the story, take it out.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
From short story to long story and more
My short story, The Vase, was part of an actual gift exchange in 2009. I did have an old mahogany vase with matching lid from Jamaica. I put dry cement into a plastic bag and sealed it into the vase and wrapped it. I put the story and manifest sheet into an envelope which accompanied the vase. So, the story was actually ABOUT the actual event that we planned to attend. It was a big hit. In fact, we attended this year's party and the vase was re-gifted.
I invented a few characters and began writing character bio's soon after the party in 2009. After about two months, I had an outline and was ready to begin writing. The result of my planning seem to pay off as I was quite surprised to write an additional 65,000 words in a little less than two weeks.
Of course, I spent a lot of time editing and now the manuscript is at revision five.
Currently, I have submitted the manuscript to Sourcebooks in Naperville. It has been fourteen weeks, but I know that it takes a while for a publishing company to review a fiction manuscript, so I am working on my plans for additional work in the meantime.
The first order of business is to prepare a solid query letter that I will send to a very select few agents. I have a list of possible agents, but the process is very long as agents also require a long time for reviewing manuscripts. I think I have a good start, but feel that I must wait for a response from Sourcebooks before I send a query to an agent.
This business of writing is not easy for an old guy like me from a different line of work. It requires a lot of patience and also a great deal of humility. Everything I've read indicates that pushing ahead before doing your homework can have very bad results. For instance, sending out manuscripts before they are ready, approaching the wrong agents, and attempting to shortcut the painstaking process of accessing professionals can all damage a writer's reputation very quickly. These folks have seen it all, and they have a tendency to appreciate a writer's due diligence.
So, it also pays to have a plan for maintaining positive momentum while waiting for a response from agents and independent publishers.
My plan is to educate myself on the business while continuing to produce creative collateral. It is a convoluted business and some of the information is contradictory, but it pays to research before making a fatal mistake that could have been the best possible opportunity for your work. Stated differently, rushing in can result in a burned bridge to your best possible resource if you are not careful. It is better to understand the landscape before moving ahead in this case, I think.
The marketing aspects of self promotion are daunting. This also requires a great deal of research and patience. I recently attended a bookstore event in which David Sterry and Arielle Eckstut, co-authors of The Essential Guide to Getting Your Book Published compared marketing collateral to a dowry. That is, today you should present yourself along with your marketing collateral as a demonstration of your commitment and ability. I have a website, but I am writing this very blog as an attempt to expand. Videos on YouTube, articles and guest blogs can also help a writer to build a following OVER TIME. It does not happen overnight!
Finally, I continue to write. I write on several blogs with some regularity, but I still have a backlog of short story ideas that I continue to produce between large projects. In fact, I wrote a short story this morning along with several relatively long blogs on our writer's group site. Yesterday, I worked on a new set of character bio's and the beginning of an outline for a possible prequel to my existing manuscript, Box of Dreams. It is a more in depth character study of the autistic son of my main characters, Art and Karen. I am considering a separate blog that will follow my writing process as I create this story. The point is, I remain busy with a variety of projects, both business related and creative as I wait for an answer from Sourcebooks.
I invented a few characters and began writing character bio's soon after the party in 2009. After about two months, I had an outline and was ready to begin writing. The result of my planning seem to pay off as I was quite surprised to write an additional 65,000 words in a little less than two weeks.
Of course, I spent a lot of time editing and now the manuscript is at revision five.
Currently, I have submitted the manuscript to Sourcebooks in Naperville. It has been fourteen weeks, but I know that it takes a while for a publishing company to review a fiction manuscript, so I am working on my plans for additional work in the meantime.
The first order of business is to prepare a solid query letter that I will send to a very select few agents. I have a list of possible agents, but the process is very long as agents also require a long time for reviewing manuscripts. I think I have a good start, but feel that I must wait for a response from Sourcebooks before I send a query to an agent.
This business of writing is not easy for an old guy like me from a different line of work. It requires a lot of patience and also a great deal of humility. Everything I've read indicates that pushing ahead before doing your homework can have very bad results. For instance, sending out manuscripts before they are ready, approaching the wrong agents, and attempting to shortcut the painstaking process of accessing professionals can all damage a writer's reputation very quickly. These folks have seen it all, and they have a tendency to appreciate a writer's due diligence.
So, it also pays to have a plan for maintaining positive momentum while waiting for a response from agents and independent publishers.
My plan is to educate myself on the business while continuing to produce creative collateral. It is a convoluted business and some of the information is contradictory, but it pays to research before making a fatal mistake that could have been the best possible opportunity for your work. Stated differently, rushing in can result in a burned bridge to your best possible resource if you are not careful. It is better to understand the landscape before moving ahead in this case, I think.
The marketing aspects of self promotion are daunting. This also requires a great deal of research and patience. I recently attended a bookstore event in which David Sterry and Arielle Eckstut, co-authors of The Essential Guide to Getting Your Book Published compared marketing collateral to a dowry. That is, today you should present yourself along with your marketing collateral as a demonstration of your commitment and ability. I have a website, but I am writing this very blog as an attempt to expand. Videos on YouTube, articles and guest blogs can also help a writer to build a following OVER TIME. It does not happen overnight!
Finally, I continue to write. I write on several blogs with some regularity, but I still have a backlog of short story ideas that I continue to produce between large projects. In fact, I wrote a short story this morning along with several relatively long blogs on our writer's group site. Yesterday, I worked on a new set of character bio's and the beginning of an outline for a possible prequel to my existing manuscript, Box of Dreams. It is a more in depth character study of the autistic son of my main characters, Art and Karen. I am considering a separate blog that will follow my writing process as I create this story. The point is, I remain busy with a variety of projects, both business related and creative as I wait for an answer from Sourcebooks.
Friday, January 14, 2011
The Vase
It all began with a short story.
THE VASE
By Del Boland
“Honey, I think I have a solution to our problem!” I yell up the stairs. “What problem?” my wife’s voice responds. “The problem with Gimmer Dean!” I yell back.
It was under a work table for almost two years. A wooden vase with a matching lid. It seems heavy as I lift it from its resting place. I wipe the dust away to partially restore the natural mahogany sheen to the outer surface.
“Ok, tonight is the big night”, I mumble to myself.
My wife gives me a suspicious look from the kitchen table as I emerge from the basement. “And where do you think you’re going with that?” she asks.
“We’re taking it to the party.”
“Absolutely not!”
“You know, she would have wanted it this way.”
“Yes, but it’s not fair to the others!” she snaps.
I feel I’m losing ground so I try a slightly different approach. “It’s really a nice vase and the story is intriguing.”
My wife looks at me over her glasses. “You cannot be serious?”
“Well, this is a group of writers and writers love good stories.”
“Yes dear, but they don't want to be burdened with the responsibility. Can’t we just forget about it?” she presses. “I don’t think anyone can blame us for not complying with such an odd request.”
I think about it for a minute. Deep down, I agree with her. It is very odd. I suppose it was my aunt’s final act of desperation. I manage to come back to the task at hand which is cleaning the vase and finding a box to wrap it.
“You know, this could be a lot of fun,” I offer. “We can give it a try and see what happens.”
“I think you’re asking for trouble. There is no way you’ll pull it off.”
“Just leave it to me. I’ll take the heat.”
I look at my watch and announce, “It’s almost six o’clock. We only have one hour.”
She goes upstairs as I fasten a bow onto the box.
My wife wraps her hair in a towel as I make my way into the master bathroom. She smirks at me in the large mirror. I smirk back while undressing. I step into the shower and allow the hot water to run through my hair and down my face. It feels good. I think about my Aunt Gimmer Dean.
She was a small woman with severe osteoporosis. The muscles in her neck were atrophied from supporting her head at such an awkward angle for so long her head drooped below the peak of her humped back. Her facial features were contorted by several strokes with her mouth up on one side and down on the other. Because her head was naturally cast downward, she always looked to the side which gave her the odd appearance of a character from a Picasso painting. It was difficult to look at her without tilting your head.
“This really is the best opportunity that we have,” I say as I step out of the shower, drying my hair with a towel.
“Maybe so, but I still think it’s a bad idea. That is, after what happened last year.”
“You don’t really believe in the curse, do you?”
“I believe it now.”
I signed for it before the calamity began. At first, I didn’t know what was in the package. I hoped for money, jewelry or stock certificates. But no, easy money was not in alignment with the other events of my life. I received a vase containing my aunt’s ashes along with some documents.
There was the bio and the story, but there was also the letter to be signed upon receipt. The letter had instructions for passing the contents of the vase along. It also provided a manifest sheet that would forever accompany the contents of the vase.
We did not follow through the first year after receiving the bequest. We talked about it, but forgot about it until beset by a series of unfortunate events.
We dismissed the everyday annoyances for a while as the maintenance items seemed quite normal. After 6 months, the problems were following a pattern of increased frequency and impact on our family. In one week the ice maker pan overflowed into the freezer, we collected a dent in the door of our new car in a parking lot, and our television stopped working. Soon thereafter, the hot water heater leaked water into the basement ruining the carpet, a tree fell on our house and my mother-in-law broke her hip. Then.....we lost our son, Josh. Something was very wrong.
“Should I wear a tie?” I ask.
“I don’t think so, I’m just wearing a nice Christmas sweater”
I button my shirt and place the envelope on the wrapped box.
“I don’t know how long I’ll be able to hold out”, my wife says to me as we back out of the driveway.
I glance over at her, sitting in the passenger seat of our car. She looks very tired after a long week at work.
“Hang in there, it’ll be a lot of fun.”
“That’s easy for you to say. You know everybody and you're unloading the curse.”
“It’s not a curse if people follow through. It'll be fine.”
We drive into Tommy Nevin’s Pub parking lot.
“What if no one will take it?” she asks as we get out of the car.
“I don’t know, we’ll have to wait and see what happens.”
A nice lady stands next to a table. I recognize her from the writer’s group.
“You can just put your gift here,” says the lady while pointing at the table. There’s a sign with “White Elephant Gift Exchange” written in large letters.
I place the package containing Aunt Gimmer Dean on the table and hand the envelope to the lady.
“I know it’s an odd request, but it should be a lot of fun. Please have the recipient of the gift sign the document inside the envelope and then deliver it back to me.”
We turn and walk toward a table with a few empty chairs. I feel relieved. I have fulfilled my duty.
THE VASE
By Del Boland
“Honey, I think I have a solution to our problem!” I yell up the stairs. “What problem?” my wife’s voice responds. “The problem with Gimmer Dean!” I yell back.
It was under a work table for almost two years. A wooden vase with a matching lid. It seems heavy as I lift it from its resting place. I wipe the dust away to partially restore the natural mahogany sheen to the outer surface.
“Ok, tonight is the big night”, I mumble to myself.
My wife gives me a suspicious look from the kitchen table as I emerge from the basement. “And where do you think you’re going with that?” she asks.
“We’re taking it to the party.”
“Absolutely not!”
“You know, she would have wanted it this way.”
“Yes, but it’s not fair to the others!” she snaps.
I feel I’m losing ground so I try a slightly different approach. “It’s really a nice vase and the story is intriguing.”
My wife looks at me over her glasses. “You cannot be serious?”
“Well, this is a group of writers and writers love good stories.”
“Yes dear, but they don't want to be burdened with the responsibility. Can’t we just forget about it?” she presses. “I don’t think anyone can blame us for not complying with such an odd request.”
I think about it for a minute. Deep down, I agree with her. It is very odd. I suppose it was my aunt’s final act of desperation. I manage to come back to the task at hand which is cleaning the vase and finding a box to wrap it.
“You know, this could be a lot of fun,” I offer. “We can give it a try and see what happens.”
“I think you’re asking for trouble. There is no way you’ll pull it off.”
“Just leave it to me. I’ll take the heat.”
I look at my watch and announce, “It’s almost six o’clock. We only have one hour.”
She goes upstairs as I fasten a bow onto the box.
My wife wraps her hair in a towel as I make my way into the master bathroom. She smirks at me in the large mirror. I smirk back while undressing. I step into the shower and allow the hot water to run through my hair and down my face. It feels good. I think about my Aunt Gimmer Dean.
She was a small woman with severe osteoporosis. The muscles in her neck were atrophied from supporting her head at such an awkward angle for so long her head drooped below the peak of her humped back. Her facial features were contorted by several strokes with her mouth up on one side and down on the other. Because her head was naturally cast downward, she always looked to the side which gave her the odd appearance of a character from a Picasso painting. It was difficult to look at her without tilting your head.
“This really is the best opportunity that we have,” I say as I step out of the shower, drying my hair with a towel.
“Maybe so, but I still think it’s a bad idea. That is, after what happened last year.”
“You don’t really believe in the curse, do you?”
“I believe it now.”
I signed for it before the calamity began. At first, I didn’t know what was in the package. I hoped for money, jewelry or stock certificates. But no, easy money was not in alignment with the other events of my life. I received a vase containing my aunt’s ashes along with some documents.
There was the bio and the story, but there was also the letter to be signed upon receipt. The letter had instructions for passing the contents of the vase along. It also provided a manifest sheet that would forever accompany the contents of the vase.
We did not follow through the first year after receiving the bequest. We talked about it, but forgot about it until beset by a series of unfortunate events.
We dismissed the everyday annoyances for a while as the maintenance items seemed quite normal. After 6 months, the problems were following a pattern of increased frequency and impact on our family. In one week the ice maker pan overflowed into the freezer, we collected a dent in the door of our new car in a parking lot, and our television stopped working. Soon thereafter, the hot water heater leaked water into the basement ruining the carpet, a tree fell on our house and my mother-in-law broke her hip. Then.....we lost our son, Josh. Something was very wrong.
“Should I wear a tie?” I ask.
“I don’t think so, I’m just wearing a nice Christmas sweater”
I button my shirt and place the envelope on the wrapped box.
“I don’t know how long I’ll be able to hold out”, my wife says to me as we back out of the driveway.
I glance over at her, sitting in the passenger seat of our car. She looks very tired after a long week at work.
“Hang in there, it’ll be a lot of fun.”
“That’s easy for you to say. You know everybody and you're unloading the curse.”
“It’s not a curse if people follow through. It'll be fine.”
We drive into Tommy Nevin’s Pub parking lot.
“What if no one will take it?” she asks as we get out of the car.
“I don’t know, we’ll have to wait and see what happens.”
A nice lady stands next to a table. I recognize her from the writer’s group.
“You can just put your gift here,” says the lady while pointing at the table. There’s a sign with “White Elephant Gift Exchange” written in large letters.
I place the package containing Aunt Gimmer Dean on the table and hand the envelope to the lady.
“I know it’s an odd request, but it should be a lot of fun. Please have the recipient of the gift sign the document inside the envelope and then deliver it back to me.”
We turn and walk toward a table with a few empty chairs. I feel relieved. I have fulfilled my duty.
So, now I have a manuscript
Last year, I wrote a 70,000 word fiction manuscript entitled Box of Dreams, an adventure of self discovery existing somewhere between The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown and The Nautical Chart by Arturo Perez Reverte.
Here is my pitch: Art's career has been sabotaged. His autistic son has been murdered. Even his suicide attempt is thwarted. But, Art's life is about to change forever as he discovers his great, great, grandfather's diary written in Vigenere's code. Art encounters a slutty ex-girlfriend, her manipulative mother, and old friends as he attempts to unravel the mysterious code in search of lost Confederate gold.
So, I'm thinking, maybe I should write about my experience. Maybe there is a benefit to maintaining a journal of sorts as I unlock the mysteries of promoting my manuscript. Hmmmmm.....sounds like a plan.
Here is my pitch: Art's career has been sabotaged. His autistic son has been murdered. Even his suicide attempt is thwarted. But, Art's life is about to change forever as he discovers his great, great, grandfather's diary written in Vigenere's code. Art encounters a slutty ex-girlfriend, her manipulative mother, and old friends as he attempts to unravel the mysterious code in search of lost Confederate gold.
So, I'm thinking, maybe I should write about my experience. Maybe there is a benefit to maintaining a journal of sorts as I unlock the mysteries of promoting my manuscript. Hmmmmm.....sounds like a plan.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)